Select your timezone:

Islet and Pancreas Overlap

Friday October 22, 2021 - 16:00 to 17:20

Room: Virtual Room 1

306.7 Do Pretransplant C-Peptide Levels Influence Outcomes in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation? A Matched Case-Control Study

Berjesh K. Sharda, United States

Asst Instructor
TRANSPLANT SURGERY
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HOSPITAL

Abstract

Do Pretransplant C-Peptide Levels Influence Outcomes in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation? A Matched Case-Control Study

Komal Gurung1, Berjesh Sharda1, Robert Stratta1, Alan Farney1, G. Orlando1, C. Jay1, Reeves Daniel2, Mena Gutierrez2, N. Sakhovskaya2, William Doares3, S. Kaczmorski3, Michael D. Gautreaux4, J. Rogers1.

1Transplant Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, United States; 2Internal Medicine Section of Nephrology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC, United States; 3Pharmacy, Wake Forest Baptist Hospital, Winston Salem, NC, United States; 4Pathology, Wake Forest Baptist Hospital, Winston Salem, NC, United States

Introduction: Experiences with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in uremic patients with detectable pretransplant C-peptide (Cp) levels with a “type 2” diabetes mellitus (DM) phenotype have demonstrated survival outcomes equivalent to those with type 1 (Cp negative) DM.  However, few studies have analyzed these outcomes in a case-control fashion. The study purpose was to evaluate outcomes in SPKT recipients according to presence or absence of pretransplant Cp.
Methods:  Selection criteria for Cp positive (Cp+, ≥2.0 ng/ml) were similar to Cp negative (Cp-) patients. We retrospectively analyzed 215 SPKTs performed at our center between 8/02 - 5/19 and identified 41 patients who were Cp+ pretransplant (mean level 5.4 ng/ml) and compared to 41 Cp- (level undetectable) case controls matched for recipient age, gender, race, and date of transplant. All SPKTs were performed as intent to treat with portal-enteric drainage; all patients received depleting antibody induction with FK/MMF ± steroids.  Pancreas graft failure (GF) was defined as return to daily insulin therapy. 
Results: The two groups were well-matched for numerous donor, preservation, recipient, and immunological characteristics. Mean donor (26 Cp+ vs 23 years Cp-) and recipient (both 44 years) ages were similar. Both groups had 21 males/20 females and 19 Caucasian (C)/20 African American (AA) patients. There was one early death secondary to infection in each group. There were no other early (<6 month) kidney GFs in either group. There were 5 other early pancreas GFs, 3 in Cp+ and 2 in Cp- patients. With a mean follow-up of 7.3 years in both groups, 5-year patient survival (PS, 93% vs 95%), kidney graft survival (GS, 73% vs 85%), and pancreas GS (68% vs 85%, p=0.11) rates were slightly lower in Cp+ vs Cp- patients, respectively. Death-censored kidney (69% vs 73%) and pancreas GS (59% vs 81%, p=0.07) rates were also slightly lower in Cp+ vs Cp- patients, respectively.  The Cp+ group had fewer deaths with functioning grafts (9.8% vs 19.5% Cp) but more pancreas GFs (9.8% vs 0 Cp-, p=0.12) due to either insulin resistance (in patients with normal C-p levels and excessive weight gain) or rejection (19.5% vs 12% Cp-, p=NS). There were no differences in outcomes according to gender or race.  Post-transplant weight gain >3 kg occurred in 76% of Cp+ vs 32% of Cp- patients (p=.0001). Mean post-transplant weight gain was 15 kg in Cp+ vs 6.5 kg in Cp- patients (p<.001). In patients with functioning grafts, mean post-transplant Cp (4.9 vs 2.6 ng/ml), HbA1c (5.5 vs 5.2%) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs 1.2 mg/dl) levels were slightly higher in Cp+ patients whereas mean eGFR levels (61 vs 66 ml/min/1.73 m2) were slightly lower compared to Cp- patients.
Conclusions: In this matched case-control study, survival and functional outcomes in Cp+ patients are slightly inferior following SPKT, with post-transplant weight gain and GF due to insulin resistance or rejection accounting for differences in outcomes.